This is not a debate

If you feel that someone/something here is "good" and not "bad," you are wrong

____________________________________________

The people who stand in the hall with their cellphones The people who talk too loud
The people who see evidence and don't want to believe The people who torture the words that come from their mouths
Corporationconglomeration
Manipulation
The war on drugs
Junk scientists Pseudoscientists Anti-scientists ID-“scientists”
Michel Foucault Jacques Derrida Julia Kristeva Bruno Latour Andrew Ross Matt Cartmill
Animal rights extremists
Sandra Harding
A jury-based legal system
Luce Irigaray Jean Baudrillard Félix Guattari

Neocons Neonazis Neohippies
The Yankees
The Steelers (sorry, Uncle Pat)
Malcolm Glazer George Steinbrenner Bob Costas Hicks Gillette
The Blue Devils (sorry, Custer)
Paul Tagliabue
People who defend foolish beliefs with homemade bombs and guns instead of reason
Lawyers who argue that their unscrupulousness is somehow morally correct because they're just doing their jobs
Everyone on the road Everyone on the sidewalk
Everyone who should jog on the sidewalk instead of in the road
Everyone in line in front of you
Everyone spitting in your food
People who say things like: "I am glad to be rid of English departments. I hate literature, for one thing, and English departments tend to be full of people who love literature."
People who write things like: "We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously."

>The opinions expressed here are solely the personal opinions of a cranky hermit<